Cases of concern

Shakthika Sathkumara

  • Location / Sri Lanka
  • Reason for persecution / Blasphemy laws
  • Current Status / On Trial
  • Last Updated / 23 June 2021
  • Country of Origin / Sri Lanka

Shakthika Sathkumara with his family shortly after his release in August 2019

Award-winning Sri Lankan writer, Shakthika Sathkumara, faced accusations of having hurt the religious feelings of Buddhists and advocated hatred in connection with a short story that he had published on his Facebook page.

Arrested on 1 April 2019, he was arbitrarily detained for 127 days while police conducted their investigation. Despite the completion of their investigation on 25 June 2019, Sathkumara was forced to wait for almost two years for the decision of the Attorney General as to whether his case would go to trial.

History of the case


On 9 February 2021, the case against writer and rationalist, Shakthika Sathkumara, was finally dropped, 22 months after his original arrest.


On 22 May 2020, the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detentions issued an opinion that Sathkumara’s 127-day detention was arbitrary and in contravention of Sri Lanka’s international human rights obligations.

Multiple hearings of both his case before the Magistrate’s court and his Fundamental Rights petition are postponed over the course of the year.


On 15 February 2019, Sathkumara published his short story ‘Ardha’ on Facebook.

On 25 February, the Buddhist Information Centre lodge a complaint against Sathkumara with the Inspector General of Police.

On 6 March, Buddhist monks reportedly visited Sathkumara’s place of work where, he reports, he was threatened and subjected to verbal abuse.

Sathkumara is summoned for questioning on 25 March.

Sathkumara was arrested on 1 April 2019 on suspicion that he had committed offences under Section 291B of the Penal Code and Article 3(1) of Sri Lanka’s ICCPR Act (2007).

His arrest followed a complaint filed by the Buddhist Information Centre, which claimed that Sathkumara’s short story ‘Ardha’ (‘Half), published on Facebook, was derogatory and defamatory to Buddhism.

Sathkumara was taken to Polgahawela police station, where he was detained for 127 days. Following his arrest, he was placed on compulsory leave from his employment.

At a hearing held on 25 June 2019, the police informed the court that their investigation has been concluded and the case has been referred to the Attorney General to render a decision as to whether to file charges against Sathkumara.

At its subsequent hearing on 9 July 2019, police appearing before the Polgahawela Magistrate Court informed the court that they had not yet been informed of the Attorney General’s decision.
Throughout subsequent hearings held before the magistrate over the course of 2019, police confirmed that they had not received instructions from the Attorney General.

Sathkumara was granted bail on 5 August 2019 by the Kurunegala High Court and was released from prison on 8 August 2019, after bail was duly furnished at Polgahawela Magistrate Court. The conditions of his bail are a 100,000-rupee (about $US575) cash guarantee and two sureties worth 200,000-rupees. Sathkumara is required to report to Polgahawela police on the second and fourth Sunday of every month.

At a hearing on 30 September 2019, Sathkumara’s fundamental rights case – filed on 29 April 2019 in order to challenge the legal validity of the charges being laid against him under the Sri Lankan Constitution – was postponed until 28 July 2020.

After eight months of being placed on administrative leave, Sathkumara was reappointed to his position on the condition that he may face a disciplinary inquiry in connection to his writing of ‘Ardha’. Such a warning comes despite the fact that regulations prohibit the administrative authorities from carrying out a disciplinary inquiry into a non-work related matter, according to his legal team. He is yet to be reimbursed for his loss of earnings incurred during his compulsory leave.

Background information

Rationalist writer Shakthika Sathkumara, is the author of seven short story collections, four poetry anthologies, a novel and at least 17 non-fiction books on literary theory, theatre art and Buddhism. He has won recognition at provincial and national levels for his short stories and poetry anthologies. Sathkumara is a regular contributor to the literary supplements of various Sinhala-language newspapers.

Shakthika Sathkumara’s award-winning publications include the short story collections Fourth Generation (2006), Black Dragon (2010), Cactus Thorns (2012), Prosecutor’s Conscience (2015), Sand (2016), and poetry collections including: Shot in the Heart (2009), Darkness (2011), Skyless Moon (2012). Most recently, he has published I Drop a Feather (2016), Radiant Woman< (2017), co-authored with Asiri Munasinghe, and Nests (2018).

Sathkumara’s short story ‘Ardha’, offered a different rendering, told by the characters of the short story, of the legendary story of “Siddhartha” in Buddhist literature. Sathkumara maintains that he did not intend to insult Buddhism nor wound the feelings of any religious community in writing his short story, which is written in a post-modernist style.

Prior to his arrest, Sathkumara worked as an Economic Development Officer at the Polgahawela Divisional Secretariat Office.

Country background

The Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka is a country of just over 20 million people occupying an island in the northern Indian Ocean. Formerly part of the British Empire, “Ceylon” attained independence in 1948, and became a republic in 1972. There are many ethnic groups on the island and Sri Lanka’s post independence history has been marked by ethnic violence.

The Constitution of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka

According to the Constitution, every person is “entitled to freedom of thought, conscience, and religion, including the freedom to have or to adopt a religion or belief of his choice.” The Constitution gives a citizen “the right either by himself or in association with others, and either in public or in private, to manifest his religion or belief in worship, observance, practice, or teaching.” However, the constitution also accords Buddhism the “foremost place” and commits the government to protecting it, but does not recognize it as the state religion.

Legal Framework

The Criminal Code under article 290 prohibits injury or “defilement” to places of worship, and under article 291 the “disturbance” of worship. 290A further criminalizes any act in a variety of circumstances within or near places of worship which is intended to “wound religious feelings” or may be considered an “insult” to religion. Moreover, the law goes on to criminalize in very broad terms any act, including speech acts and written words, made with the intention of “wounding the religious feelings of any person” (article 291A) or “outraging the religious feelings of any class of persons” (291B), respectively. These are all imprisonable offences.

Article 3(1) of the ICCPR Act 56 of 2007, states: ‘no person shall propagate war or advocate national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence’ and makes any such crime a non-bailable offence which is punishable by up to 10 years in prison. Sri Lanka’s ICCPR Act 2007 falls short of international standards guaranteeing the right to freedom of expression.

Together with the Prevention of Terrorism (Temporary Provisions) Act No. 48 of 1979 these articles form the basis for Sri Lanka’s legal framework to combat hate speech.

Following a recent country visit, Ahmed Shaheed, UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief, noted that:

“civil society has observed that certain actors have attempted to misuse the ICCPR Act to restrict freedom of expression and crush dissent. Although inciting to discrimination, hostility and violence is criminalised under the ICCPR Act, many argued that the Act was not applied in a manner that would protect minorities against incitement; rather, it is invoked to protect religions or beliefs against criticism or perceived insult. ICCPR Act has ironically become a repressive tool curtailing freedom of thought or opinion, conscience and religion or belief.”

Humanists International is aware of several cases of individuals peacefully exercising their right to freedom of expression or belief who are facing complaints under Article 291(B) and 3(1) of the penal code and ICCPR Act, respectively.

Lived experience

According to Humanists International’s Humanists at Risk: Action Report 2020,  Humanists and atheists in Sri Lanka face significant social stigma and discrimination.

One of the most difficult things for non-religious people is to gather in public with like-minded people. One respondent to Humanists International’s survey stated:

“Humanists can have gatherings and meetings only for a selected crowd at in-house auditoriums (subject to the permission of the management). Arranging a large public gathering or meeting is not possible as there could be troubles created by Buddhist monks. Particularly, ex-Muslims have no way of gathering in public, whether small or large, their safety and privacy would be at high risk. Ex-Muslim gatherings are always secret.”

Humanists International’s concerns and calls

Humanists International believes that Sathkumara was targeted for the peaceful exercise of his right to freedom of expression and calls on the Sri Lankan authorities to compensate him for the hardship he suffered over the intervening 22 months.

Humanists International’s work to support Sathkumara

Since taking up the case in May 2020, Humanists International has advocated for the case against Sathkumara to be dropped, including raising his case at the Human Rights Council.

WordPress theme developer - whois: Andy White London