On 4 April 2022, Bala’s application for bail was rejected by the Kano State High Court.
On 5 April, Bala was convicted of 18 counts of causing a public disturbance under Sections 210 and 114 of the Kano State Penal Code, respectively. Bala was sentenced to 24 years in prison. Bala pled guilty to the charges in court. It was not part of the agreed legal strategy, and came as a surprise his legal team. It is likely that he was subjected to intimidation, and could have been tricked into pleading guilty in the hopes of a light sentence. There have been unconfirmed reports of threats against his family members.
On 1 February 2022, Bala is formally arraigned in court. The court appearance represents the first time Bala has appeared in court in the 644 days in which he has been detained. During the session, Bala denied all charges. A ruling on Bala’s petition for bail is expected in the coming months as the case proceeds to trial.
A hearing before the Kano State High Court set for 12 December was postponed at the last moment due to the judge undergoing eye surgery the previous day.
A hearing before the Kano State High Court set for 13 October had to be postponed after the judge fell ill. A new date has been set for December.
On 9 September 2021, Humanists International was informed that Bala had been denied access medical treatment after complaining of pain in his left side and high blood pressure.
Under rules 24 and 27 of the United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners (also known as the ‘Mandela Rules’), the State is responsible for the provision of healthcare to those imprisoned or detained, such care should meet the same standards that are available in the community outside of prison, and all “prisons shall ensure prompt access to medical attention in urgent cases.” Although not legally binding under international law, the Mandela Rules have been adopted by the UN General Assembly as the minimum standard related to the treatment of individuals in detention.
On 3 August 2021, formal charges were brought against Bala before the Kano State High Court. Bala, who was not present in court, was formally charged with causing a public disturbance under Sections 210 and 114 of the Penal Code of Kano State, respectively.
In a charge sheet filed before the Kano State High Court – believed to have been back-dated to 22 June 2021 – Bala was charged with 10 counts of causing a public disturbance under Sections 210 and 114 of the Kano State Penal Code, respectively, in connection with five Facebook posts Bala is alleged to have made in April 2020.
Bala spends his 37th birthday behind bars.
On 14 July, a hearing of Bala’s second fundamental rights petition is held. The case is adjourned following the failure of respondents to appear in court. The case is subsequently adjourned once again on 22 July. The next hearing is expected to take place in September.
Bala spends his 365th day in detention without charge on 28 April. UN experts call for his release. 89 organizations and concerned individuals across the globe sign an open letter addressed to Kano State Governor Umar Ganduje to free Bala.
A hearing before the Federal High Court in Abuja is postponed on 20 April owing to the closure of the court due to industrial action.
On 1 March 2021, the Federal High Court in Abuja presided over the first hearing related to Bala’s lawyer’s petition challenging the competence of Kano State to bring charges against their client.
The Attorney General of Kano State was absent from the hearing, while the Nigerian Correctional Service asked for more time to respond. The court was adjourned until 20 April.
Legal team file second fundamental rights petition, seeking Bala’s relocation to Abuja, where he stands a greater chance of receiving a fair trial.
Bala’s legal team remain concerned that their client would not receive a fair trial should be be formally brought to trial in Kano State, where the population is predominantly Muslim, and Sharia courts operate alongside secular courts. Further, predominantly Muslim states have frequently seen riots, violence and murder after blasphemy accusations, sometimes against individual Muslims accused, but with potential for wider violence when the accused is Christian. For these reasons, Bala’s legal team believe that the transferral of Bala to stand trial in a more neutral location would not only safeguard their client’s rights, but prevent violence in the state at large.
Following a series of delays, the Federal High Court in Abuja ruled that Bala’s continuous incarceration was illegal and ordered his immediate release on 21 December 2021. The Court also awarded 250,000 Naira (around $500USD) against the Respondents.
On 20 November 2020, the legal team working for Nigerian humanist, Mubarak Bala, were alerted through unofficial channels to a possible move by the Kano state authorities to present their client in court. Over the course of the following week, the lawyers sought access to their client and to monitor proceedings, however their efforts faced multiple obstructions, sparking fears that Bala may be subjected to a secret trial. The magistrate adjourned the pre-trial hearing until 16 December 2020.
Shortly following rumours of his death in custody on 2 October 2020, a member of Bala’s chosen legal team was able to meet with him for the first time since his arrest. During the meeting, Bala expressed his fears to him and stated how inmates have threatened to kill him if he does not make peace with God. He therefore fears for his life and that of his wife and child.
Bala’s fundamental rights petition was heard before the Abuja High Court on 19 October. No defence was entered by the authorities. The judge has adjourned provisionally until 10 December for judgement.
On 6 August 2020, Bala spent his 100th day in detention. On this day, renowned Nigerian poet and humanist, Wole Soyinka, wrote him a letter of solidarity.
Following significant delays, the police were served with the court order compelling them to grant Bala’s legal team access to their client. As of 24 July, the police commissioner had failed to comply with the order arguing that the wording does not specifically order police to grant the access.
Following repeated requests, on 24 June 2020, a magistrate granted Bala’s legal team’s motion to meet with their client. However a case backlog at the court delays the issuance of the order.
Although Bala has been denied access to his legal team, it is believed that he was formally detained under the Cybercrimes Act at a hearing in a Kano Magistrate’s Court on 6 May 2020. Bala is not thought to have appeared in court.
On 8 May 2020, Bala’s legal counsel filed a fundamental rights petition with the Abuja High Court, seeking to secure Bala’s release on the basis that his detention violates his rights to liberty, fair trial, freedom of thought and expression, and freedom of movement as enshrined in the Nigerian Constitution and international human rights law.
A first hearing was initially scheduled to take place on 25 May, however, had to be postponed due to the date coinciding with a public holiday. The hearing was further postponed on 18 June, and is expected to take place on 9 July 2020.
Mubarak Bala was arrested by detectives from Kano State Police Command, reported to be dressed in plain clothes, on 28 April 2020. Bala was initially held in detention in Gbabasawa police station, Kaduna state. However, on 30 April, the Police Commissioner for Kaduna State confirmed that he had been released to Kano State Police Command. Attempts to locate Bala, made by his legal team, have been unsuccessful.
Bala’s arrest followed a petition filed with the Police Commissioner of Kano Command on 27 April by law firm, S. S. Umar & Co., in which Bala was alleged to have insulted the Prophet Muhammad in his Facebook posts in violation of Section 26(1)(c) of the Cybercrimes Act, which criminalises insult of any persons due to their belonging to a group distinguished by their religion, among other characteristics, and is punishable by a fine and/or up to five years’ imprisonment. The petitioners also allege that Bala’s posts will incite the Muslim community and lead to public disturbance under Section 210 of the Penal Code of Kano State.
Under section 35(3) of the Nigerian Constitution, Bala should have been informed of the grounds for his detention in writing within 24 hours of his arrest. To date, Bala has not been charged with a crime and has not been granted access to his legal counsel.
Comments on Bala’s Facebook post have called for him to be killed.
Further, individuals have threatened to burn down the police station in which he is being held and kill him were he to set foot in Kano.
Among those threatening to kill him is a sergeant attached to Bauchi State Police Command. According to Sahara Reporters, the sergeant in question is “notorious for using a fake named – Datti Assalafiy – on Facebook to spread hatred and religious bigotry – where he encourages his over 160,000 followers to execute Christians and others, who don’t share in their extreme ideas.”
On 26 April 2020, a Change.org petition calling for Bala’s Facebook account to be closed garnered over 17,000 signatures. The petition was subsequently taken down by Change.org.
Mubarak Bala, born in Kano state, northern Nigeria, in 1984 is a well known and respected member of the Humanist movement. A chemical engineer by training, he is president of the Humanist Association of Nigeria.
On 8 January 2021, Bala was awarded Humanist Society Scotland’s Gordon Ross Humanist of the Year Award.
In June 2014, Bala was held against his will for 18 days in a psychiatric ward of Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital in Kano, Northern Nigeria, after he was assessed as needing psychiatric help because he was an “atheist”. His father, formerly a senior member of the Islamic religious authorities, had orchestrated Mubarak’s detention, after Mubarak renounced Islam and declared himself an atheist. Bala was released due to a strike at the hospital which saw many patients discharged.
Following his release, he reported receiving death threats.
Approximately half of the population are Muslims, around 40% are Christians, and about 10% are of traditional indigenous religions or no religion. Non-religious people face social persecution and prohibitive social taboos in Nigeria. Indeed, it took 17 years of campaigning for humanist and atheist groups – such as the Humanist Association of Nigeria, the Northern Nigeria Humanist Movement, the Atheist Society of Nigeria and Lagos Humanists – to be allowed by the State to register as official organisations.
“Apostasy” and “blasphemy” are prohibited by law and punishable by death in the Sharia systems that operate in parallel with Customary systems in Northern states.
While the Constitution of Nigeria prohibits the adoption of any religion as State Religion, the state endorses numerous anti-secular and theocratic policies. Islam is often regarded as de facto state religion in nine of the northern states, where the majority of the population is Muslim. The Constitution gives states the power to establish their own Sharia courts on civil matters. Muslims are required to abide by Sharia law in some states and optional in others. The actual enforcement differs from state to state.
Sections 38 and 39 of Nigeria’s Constitution respectively guarantee the rights of citizens to freedom of thought, conscience and religion – including freedom to change their religion or belief – and the right to freedom of expression.
Both of Nigeria’s parallel court systems, Customary and Sharia, outlaw “blasphemy”.
Under the Customary system, applicable nationwide, “blasphemy” is prohibited under section 204 of the Criminal Code. Section 204, “Insult to religion”, states:
“Any person who does an act which any class of persons consider as a public insult on their religion, with the intention that they should consider the act such an insult, and any person who does an unlawful act with the knowledge that any class of persons will consider it such an insult, is guilty of a misdemeanour, and is liable to imprisonment for two years.”
States subject to Sharia courts can and do implement severe punishments for crimes such as “blasphemy”, including execution.
Sections 275–279 of the Constitution give states the power to establish their own Sharia courts of appeal for civil matters. Abiding by Sharia law is required for Muslims in some states but optional in others and enforcement differs by state. The introduction of criminal law aspects of Shari’a, the continued state use of resources to fund the mosque construction, education of Kadis (Muslim judges), pilgrimages to Mecca (Hajj), and religious instruction in schools, mean that Islam is often regarded, and is in effect, the de facto state religion of numerous northern states.
In addition to handing down executions, predominantly Muslim states have frequently seen riots, violence and murder after blasphemy accusations, sometimes against individual Muslims accused, but with potential for wider violence when the accused is Christian.
The population of Kano is predominantly Muslim, and Sharia courts operate alongside secular courts and are known to pass heavy sentences for perceived “blasphemy”.
Over the course of 2020, there have been several high-profile cases of individuals facing prosecution under blasphemy laws. They include the case of singer Yahaya Sharif-Aminu, who is currently appealing the death sentence, and a 13-year-old boy whose sentence to 10 years in prison was subsequently discharged.
The criminalization of blasphemy can never be justified under the international human rights framework. Blasphemy laws are inherently subjective laws that prevent legitimate, and often necessary, criticism of protected religions and religious figures. As such, they violate the human right to freedom of expression and the human right to freedom of thought, conscience, religion or belief. These rights are protected by all major international human rights instruments (including Articles 18 and 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights ICCPR) and Articles 8 and 9 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights). General Comment 34 on the ICCPR explicitly affirms that, “prohibitions of displays of lack of respect for a religion or other belief system, including blasphemy laws, are incompatible” with human rights (CCPR/C/GC/34:48).
Not only are anti-blasphemy laws unlawful in international human rights terms, they are often used by governments to silence dissenting views on politics, calls for individual freedoms, or to provoke hatred against minorities.
Crucially, for many of our members across the world the very manifestation of their fundamental right to freedom of belief is construed as blasphemous.
Humanists International fears that Bala is being targeted solely for having exercised his rights to freedom of belief and freedom of expression, which are protected under the Nigerian Constitution, and under international and regional instruments to which Nigeria is a signatory.
In a country where many regard ex-Muslims as “apostates” and extremist Islamists pose a serious threat; given that Bala is incarcerated in a Kano State correctional facility, Humanists International is deeply concerned for Bala’s safety.
As of today, we call on the relevant Nigerian authorities to do the following:
Humanists International has been working to support grassroots efforts to secure Bala’s release by ensuring that Bala’s case remains in the international public eye. The organization has secured a legal team to represent Bala, which is crowdfunded. The organization maintains close contacts with leading experts on freedom of religion or belief and diplomatic representatives in the country.